Arofanatics Fish Talk Forums  

Go Back   Arofanatics Fish Talk Forums > General Aquatic Forums > Freshwater Invertebrates Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-10-2013, 11:04 PM   #21
johnchor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

yes bro

even though max 6inches they need a 4ft tank
or a FTG... btw thier jaws seems very powerful ar,,,

Quote:
Originally Posted by IK2 View Post
We will never fully replicate nature; but we're no exactly going to stuff them into little containers we see fit, are we?

Most of these things need a decently sized tanks.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2013, 01:08 PM   #22
Blur Blur
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

We cannot use stuffing into small space as a reason to ban animal. Betta and aro in tank are consider small and should ava ban them too. If that is sole reason of banning then is pretty lame .
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2013, 11:15 PM   #23
Oneiromancer
Dragon
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,614
Default

The reason for the ban is partly because they don't belong here and if pet owners release them into the wild, may upset the balance in the eco system (being endangered is another reason of course).
Oneiromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2013, 11:29 PM   #24
johnchor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

agreed!

same goes for humans too...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneiromancer View Post
The reason for the ban is partly because they don't belong here and if pet owners release them into the wild, may upset the balance in the eco system (being endangered is another reason of course).
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2013, 01:27 AM   #25
gavin
Endangered Dragon
 
gavin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,310
Default This is what I found in Ava website.

Singapore does not allow the keeping of*certain pets such as reptiles, amphibians and primates as pets for the following reasons:

They may introduce and spread diseases to humans and domestic animals.
Collection of wild animals for trading will lead to ecosystem imbalance and threaten the survival of endangered species.
The welfare of the animals may be compromised due to reasons such as unsuitable living conditions, poor diet and pet owner's lack of knowledge of the proper care for the animal.
Singapore's biodiversity would be greatly affected if such exotic pets were released in the wild, as most of them are non-native.
If the animal escapes, it may cause nuisance, fear and trauma to the general public.
Some examples include star tortoises, iguanas, tarantulas, scorpions, snakes, salamanders, sugar gliders, hedgehogs, slow lorises, gibbons*etc. For a list of pets that are approved to be kept in Singapore, please click here.
gavin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2013, 02:31 AM   #26
swiltz1989
Arofanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gavin View Post
Singapore does not allow the keeping of*certain pets such as reptiles, amphibians and primates as pets for the following reasons:

They may introduce and spread diseases to humans and domestic animals.
Collection of wild animals for trading will lead to ecosystem imbalance and threaten the survival of endangered species.
The welfare of the animals may be compromised due to reasons such as unsuitable living conditions, poor diet and pet owner's lack of knowledge of the proper care for the animal.
Singapore's biodiversity would be greatly affected if such exotic pets were released in the wild, as most of them are non-native.
If the animal escapes, it may cause nuisance, fear and trauma to the general public.
Some examples include star tortoises, iguanas, tarantulas, scorpions, snakes, salamanders, sugar gliders, hedgehogs, slow lorises, gibbons*etc. For a list of pets that are approved to be kept in Singapore, please click here.
thanks for info
swiltz1989 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2013, 10:16 PM   #27
IK2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Some of these reasons have become obsolete nowadays.

But in my opinion, the authorities can do whatever they want given the state of the general public's efforts in proper pet care. Hopefully this changes along with the legislation in the near future.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2013, 10:28 PM   #28
johnchor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

the contradicting 1 is RES is non-native and invasive species... but allowed for many years... while local species like leaf and spiny turtles are not allowed...

any thoughts?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2013, 10:11 AM   #29
Oneiromancer
Dragon
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnchor View Post
the contradicting 1 is RES is non-native and invasive species... but allowed for many years... while local species like leaf and spiny turtles are not allowed...

any thoughts?
Haha.. agreed and this is the one that most people release into the wild..
Oneiromancer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2013, 12:51 PM   #30
gavin
Endangered Dragon
 
gavin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,310
Default

Maybe we should write in to A VA and see their reply.
gavin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +9. The time now is 09:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Arofanatics.com (Since 30th August 2000)