|
31-05-2016, 12:19 PM | #1 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 35
|
Flurval sp6
Dear All,
need some advise on my return pump. I am currently having 5ft by 2ft by 2.5ft tank running with a 3ft sump. high bioload that why considering a higher flow to filter the water faster. Is it advisable to use Flurval SP6 or Ehiem 1264 will do? All comment and solution is much appreciated. thanks. |
31-05-2016, 02:04 PM | #2 |
Senior Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,048
|
what kind of issues are u facing currently? detectable ammonia/nitrites, or cloudy water etc? u need to determine if u need more mech or bio filtration, or both.
improving turnover rate is one thing, but it also depends on your media type and capacity. 3ft sump is a bit small for a high bioload 5ft. and the cheaper / lousier media will have comparatively less total surface area than more porous media. 5x2.5x2 tank is roughly 700 litres. eheim 1264 is 4500l/h. tats around 6 x turnover rate per hour which is enough for most tanks so if u're having water issues u might want to consider upgrading media as well. sp6 has around 12000/h, but in order to utilise that flowrate u need sufficient media capacity to begin with. personally i'll go for high flowrate, especially if there's rays in the tank. Last edited by shermie; 31-05-2016 at 02:15 PM. Reason: read wrongly |
31-05-2016, 03:23 PM | #3 | |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
I do agree with 3ft sump abit small to support my 5ft tank, that why I pack my sump with only Biohomme plus and Marine Pure media. Currently ammonia and nitrite level are both at zero (or undetectable level with API test kit). So I am considering a higher flow rate of SP6 to Ehiem 1264. I had never use such high flow rate before I not sure if it is suitable for a 5ft tank. Will the flow cause strong movement water that will stress the livestock in tank? I have 1 Aro, 2 Rays and 6 ITs. |
|
31-05-2016, 05:42 PM | #4 |
Senior Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,048
|
if ammonia n nitrites are 0 at all times including right after heavy feeding i dont see a need to change anything. unless u want better mech filtration.
flow wise shouldnt be an issue. it's not like a wavemaker blowing directly into the fish. if anything your fish will prefer the higher flow. rays especially. |
01-06-2016, 11:28 AM | #5 |
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 35
|
Thanks for your input will considered a higher flow rate for my tank to have a better flow rate (hopefully better quality water and happier fish)
Cheers... Have a good day ahead |
02-06-2016, 03:38 PM | #6 |
AFC Committee
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 397
|
Since you have Ehiem 1264 already, i will stick with it.
and sp6 has around 12000/h, your existing piping diameter, drill hole etc have to be able to coup with this turn, else also bottleneck.
__________________
Sometimes life hits you in the head with a brick. Don't lose faith. - Steve Jobs |
02-06-2016, 04:29 PM | #7 |
Endangered Dragon
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 8,037
|
ive read slower flow rate better for Biological filter ,
faster flow rate is better for mechanical . |
04-06-2016, 12:36 PM | #8 | |
Senior Dragon
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,048
|
Quote:
it's all relative. total surface area, total contact time, flow rate, bioload etc all goes hand in hand. even if u have a ton of good media, but with high bioload and low turnover, u wont have enough water passing through your media to have it work at full efficiency. on the other hand if there's already 0 ammonia and nitrites, increasing flow wouldnt do anything in the biological filtration department, but will still help for mechanical. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|