|
|
View Poll Results: Is Tripod Needed For Good Photography? | |||
Good! Must Use! | 2 | 66.67% | |
Don't need! Used other method to support. | 1 | 33.33% | |
Don't need! Use hand to shoot, can already! | 1 | 33.33% | |
Any other comments... | 0 | 0% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-05-2002, 12:38 PM | #1 |
Dragon
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,152
|
Tripod essential for camera is needed for stability.
Tripod stand is essential for stability and good shots! Can't think of anything better, any improvised methods besides the use of tripods? Can even extend the lenght and angle of tripod: Bagus! What you guys/gals think of this?? Less than S$35 from Sim Lim SQ. (2 yrs ago) Full view of extended tripod below: http://www.geocities.com/lfs2002sg/tripod.htm Last edited by Asia_landscape; 05-05-2002 at 12:42 PM. |
07-05-2002, 09:32 AM | #2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes, the tripod stand is for the stability issue. I had tried that on my aros, and I found it difficult to compromise between auto-focus and stability. When I take closer shots, let's say 20 cm infront the glass, an aro that is swim close to the front glass will vary the distance to camera very fast (if the camera is stand still), and hence is hard for the camera to get an accurate auto-focus. Therefore, (after then), I always move camera along with the aro (keep the distance) with my hands. Anyway, more than 50% of shots failed is not avoidable. No easy way!!!
|
07-05-2002, 10:41 AM | #3 | |
Dragon
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,152
|
Quote:
CDM, no problem! You have a pair of fast response hands and the speed of your camera lens movement must match the speed of fast moving objects. If you are not taking video, you can take individual shots at various static landmark positions of your aro. "Pause" the camera when your aro in fast motion. "Record" again when he starts to slow down. Then you have a series & continuous stream of "Pic frames" The Panasonic analogue-camera currently using have a "run mode", that means can even take people racing or in motion, i've try that, not too bad. The focusing is not perfect, of course, still can do. From what I know, some video cams have faster repsonse time than others when taking motion videos. (unless you are taking racing cars , that'll be a different story) I think our eye lens are still the best! Can auto focus at fast resolution time in less than SPLIT Seconds! should be less than nano-seconds, x 10 exp(-9)!!!! No camera in the world can come close to this match,,, CDM & the rest of photographers/fish hobbyists: All the best for your video shots! Last edited by Asia_landscape; 07-05-2002 at 10:59 AM. |
|
07-05-2002, 08:40 PM | #4 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Asia_landscape, sounds like you're in nano-business....hehe
Recently, I saw some new D8 (digital camcorder) with 1.55 Mega Pixels (for still picture) CCD plate. I think this kind of D8 really can do something. Unfortunately, it's too expensive (cost a red aro). And, as you just mentioned, camorder have higher responding speed (normally). |
09-05-2002, 08:15 PM | #5 | |
Dragon
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,152
|
Quote:
Into sub_atomic leve liao... I canot afford too exp cam, just normal one will be fine for me... Anyway, the price of electronic gadgets will always plunge if new gadgets appear on the markets, if SG sign more FTAs (free trade agreement), or technology keeps improving to mass produce these devices... Sometimes to the point that consumers like us are overwhelmed by the choice available.. To remain simple is the better choice... |
|
09-05-2002, 11:01 PM | #6 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
10-05-2002, 02:02 PM | #7 | |
Dragon
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,152
|
Quote:
|
|
14-05-2002, 12:00 AM | #8 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|