Arofanatics Fish Talk Forums  

Go Back   Arofanatics Fish Talk Forums > The Guildhouse > Chatterbox

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-06-2018, 03:22 PM   #1
jwhtan
Barney

 
jwhtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,118
Default Han Fook Kwang commentary

In “Ministers, please speak plainly to the people”,
Han praised the “earnest and thoughtful” speeches in Parliament over the past two weeks that were made in the course of the debate on the President’s address.
The only hitch, he argues: they may not have connected all that well to the man in the street.

“What does equipping Singaporeans with a ‘global mindset and skillsets’ mean to someone worried about holding on to his job or who has just lost it.
What does an education system with ‘diverse pathways and multiple peaks of excellence’ mean to the parent struggling to help her children cope with school work?”
While indeed, Han says, the ideas shared by the ministers in their speeches are important and form the basis for many policies in Singapore,
“there is also a place” for leaders to use the language of ordinary people when speaking about the problems they face and the hopes they have.
He argues that the ordinary Singaporeans would want their leaders to demonstrate that they do understand their anxieties and concerns,
and would in that scenario be more likely to listen to what they are thinking, as well as what their plans are to improve their lot.

Gov’t should promise security in education, and in retirement for working Singaporeans

Han then went on to draft a couple of speech sequences he felt would be more effective in getting the government’s messages across —
one of them involved an assurance that no matter what work a Singaporean happened to be doing, as long as they have had a “full working life”,
they would be able to retire with enough to live a “good and decent” life.
“I think Singapore leaders should make such a promise to the people.
It is unacceptable for a country with one of the highest per capita incomes in the world to have so many people retire after working all their lives without adequate retirement security.”
He also asserted his wish that the government should give assurance to people that a child,
having completed 10 to 12 years’ primary and secondary school education in Singapore, will be able to find a place in a tertiary institution
— whether this be ITE, a polytechnic or university.
“When you speak plainly, you are compelled to be clear in your thinking about what you intend to do.
There should be nowhere to hide behind unnecessary verbiage. This is especially important when there is so much more noise out there today,
from so many voices, especially in the online world.”
jwhtan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2018, 03:28 PM   #2
jwhtan
Barney

 
jwhtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,118
Default Enter Minister Heng Swee Keat’s press secretary

Mr Han Fook Kwang is correct: Ministers should indeed speak plainly to the people.
This does not only mean using simple language that people understand. It also means telling people the truth.
This is what the PAP Government has been doing for close to 60 years.
Ministers and MPs spend considerable time on the ground hearing from citizens, answering their questions, explaining policy.
And as Mr Han knows well, this Government has never flinched from telling people “Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going”. He once helped edit a book with that title.
The most recent example is the Budget Speech, where the Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat announced it will be necessary to raise the GST
in the next term of Government and explained clearly why.
Unfortunately, some opposition MPs sought to avoid debating this issue in Parliament, preferring to wait till the heat of the hustings when emotions rather than reason rule.

The injunction to “speak plainly” applies to journalists and commentators too. Mr Han begins by urging Ministers to speak plainly – meaning use simple language.
His column then morphs into a dare to Ministers to make sweeping promises.
For example, he wants Ministers to assure people that if they had “a full working life in Singapore, in any job, when you retire at 65,
you will have enough to live a good and decent life.”
“We will make sure it happens,” Mr Han urges Ministers to say, “don’t worry about the details or how we will do it.”
But plain speaking about adequate retirement would also entail telling people some “hard truths”.
For example, the CPF scheme is adequate for most Singaporeans, and Silver Support will help top up for those who did not earn much while working.
However, as people live longer, their needs in old age will go up. Then we will have either to work longer, save more while working, or have less to spend in retirement.
Voters in many countries, developed and developing, have learnt through bitter experience what happens when unrealistic election promises are broken.
Politicians and journalists who advocate simplistic policies lose credibility, faith in democracy is undermined, and ultimately voters or their children bear the cost.
The easiest five words to utter in politics are “I promise you free lunches”. But that’s not plain speech. That’s pandering and populism.
jwhtan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2018, 03:36 PM   #3
jwhtan
Barney

 
jwhtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,118
Default In defence of Mr Han

The former editor of the straits times has found himself once again on the receiving end of a scolding from a vindictive, hypersensitive and irrational government.
And I use all 3 adjectives deliberately and accurately. They apply to this present government, whether they are made up of 2G, 3G or 4G ministers.

So, what is it that Mr Han has done that has so tormented the political leadership that it feels it had to give him a dressing down in public?

Poor Mr Han. All he did was to offer his two cents worth of advice to the multi-millionaire ministers, after witnessing their speeches in the recent opening of Parliament.
In truth, it was a pretty heartfelt, sincere and rather commonsense piece of advice which no sensible person in a leadership position would find fault with.
But ours is no ordinary leadership (which is why they pay themselves the big bucks, remember), and Mr Han’s honest counsel drew blood,
instead of understanding, from a resentful government.
Mr Han, for eg, had suggested (really, that was all he actually did) that ministers should speak plainly if they wanted to establish a connection with the man in the street.
Ministers should, he said, avoid speaking in the abstract.
“When problems and issues are cast in these terms,” he explained, “they lose the human connection and become hard for the ordinary folk to relate to.”
In other words, spare the people the high-falutin rhetoric. Cut to the chase. Get real. Come down from your high horse. Take the lift down from the Ivory Tower.
Speak in human tongue. You get the gist.

What does equipping Singaporeans with a ‘global mindset and skillsets’ mean to someone worried about holding on to his job or who has just lost it?”,
What does an education system with ‘diverse pathways and multiple peaks of excellence’ mean to the parent struggling to help her children cope with school work?
Indeed, what does it mean to the average struggling Singaporean worker to hear his manpower minister pontificate about how he is going to
“prepare people for tomorrow’s jobs with tomorrow’s skills”?
By the time he is done readying himself for tomorrow’s job with tomorrow’s skills, his family may have already starved to death.
That, in a nutshell, is what Mr Han is saying – speak in real terms, so your struggling citizen can relate.

But no. Mr Han’s sensible advice was taken as insult, as that of a young upstart speaking out of turn to an elder.
In the infamous words of one George Yeo, Mr Han had shown a “boh tua boh sui” (disrespect of an elder) attitude.
And so in came Mr Heng – yes, the same Finance Minister Mr Heng who just 3 weeks earlier had declared to the entire nation that his government
was going to hold a national discussion with Singaporeans and would “listen with humility and respect” –
that same Mr Heng sent in his press secretary with a dreadful attempted smackdown of Mr Han.
If you can’t bear to know what Mr (or is it Ms?) Lim Yuin Chien, the aforementioned press secretary, wrote in her letter to the Straits Times, it basically said:
“Oh bugger off, Mr Han!”
But if your tolerance threshold is higher, she in fact accused Mr Han of “pandering and populism.”
“Politicians and journalists who advocate simplistic policies,” he said, “lose credibility, faith in democracy is undermined, and ultimately, voters or their children bear the cost.”
He forgot to add that also our women will become maids in other countries, investors will run away, the ground will open up,
and apocalypse will descend on all of us like a ginormous fart of fetid hot air.
But Mr Lim was not done.
“Voters in many countries, developed and developing, have learnt through bitter experience what happens when unrealistic election promises are broken,” he preached,
dragging out the half-dead bogeyman behind his tail.
Wait a minute. All Mr Han asked for was a simple, general, assurance from the government to the struggling Singaporean. Is that too much to ask?
Well, let’s visit what and how exactly Mr Han phrased his suggestion.
He actually wrote down word-for-word how a minister might actually say it to the person if he (the person) was standing in front of the minister.

The minister, Mr Han wrote, could say to the person:
“I promise you that if you have had a full working life in Singapore, in any job, whether you are a cleaner, a security guard, a taxi driver or a waiter,
when you retire at 65, you will have enough to live a good and decent life. We will make sure it happens – don’t worry about the details or how we will do it.
The only thing we ask is that you must do your part and be serious about your job.”
Reasonable. Thoughtful. Sober. Relatable.
Right?
Wrong!
Back came the gnashing of teeth from Mr Lim, who spat out (yes, it is possible to gnash and spit at the same time if you’re angry enough) this rebuttal:
“The easiest five words to utter in politics are: “I promise you free lunches.” But that’s not plain speech. That’s pandering and populism.”
Poor Mr Oliver Han. He didn’t even ask for free food or for seconds. He only requested assurance that there will be food on the table when we are old.
He was also willing to work for it, and all his life too.
Kidding and sarcasm aside, if this is how the new leadership is going to respond to well-meaning, heartfelt advice and suggestion,
then Singaporeans should not be interested in wasting their time attending any “national conversation” events.
The leadership seems to only want to hear what they want to hear.
Mr Han’s advice, to anyone who read his entire article, was not written with the dripping ink of malice,
but with the concerns of someone who has, in recent times, raised pertinent issues which affect many.
Yet, each time he is beaten down by the ministers.
(See here.)
(As an aside, Mr Han should take it as a compliment that it is ministers who respond to what he says.
He should start collecting the feathers for his cap. He might need a big one soon too.)

And let’s also say this plainly to Mr Heng: You cannot in one breath say you “will listen with humility and respect”,
and in the next lambast someone (anyone) who take you at your word and offers his sincere advice and suggestions.
You would be a hypocrite. And no one likes or trusts hypocrites.
Neither would they like to discuss anything with such a person.
So, tell your press secretary to stuff it, save his (or is it her?) venom for real agitators,
and realise that condescension is a poison which will kill trust between your government and the people.
If you are serious about listening – with humility and respect – you would not have instructed your henchman to put out such a spiteful response.
Consider making an apology to Mr Han, and truly listen and hear what well-meaning people are telling you, Mr Heng.

As for Mr Han, we hope he will continue to speak plainly, and speak often and honestly.
He should not let these ministers intimidate him into silence, or worse, become fatalistic.

An arrogant and condescending government is, in case we forget, a government we should vote out. And the sooner the better, for our country’s sake.
Unless they humble themselves before the people and realise that it is the people they work for, and not the other way round.
jwhtan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2018, 03:54 PM   #4
satan_gal
Dragon
 
satan_gal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,714
Default

Some prefer to read bits and pieces....

https://mothership.sg/2018/06/han-fo...ee-keat-reply/

Actually I already give up on the current government liao. talk so much also no use.
satan_gal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2018, 05:16 PM   #5
streetsmart73

Hi there !!! 123
 
streetsmart73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,895
Default

In the nutshell: don't listen; kosong ground sentiments
streetsmart73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2018, 10:29 PM   #6
jwhtan
Barney

 
jwhtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,118
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwhtan View Post

And let’s also say this plainly to Mr Heng: You cannot in one breath say you “will listen with humility and respect”,
and in the next lambast someone (anyone) who take you at your word and offers his sincere advice and suggestions.


I am especially agreeable to this part ........

on one hand, u say u will listen " with humility and respect "
and on the other hand, when someone feedback to u,
u freaking ridicule and rebuke him

i seriously cannot see where the " humility and respect " is
if anyone can see, pls kindly point it out to me

greatly appreciated
jwhtan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2018, 01:34 AM   #7
Ong88

Prof SK Ong
 
Ong88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 10,641
Default

Just do a Khairy
Gave Najib more rope, now he's future pm designate
__________________



Just because it's a bad idea doesn't mean it won't be a good time.
Use imgur for your photos sharing
https://play.google.com/store/apps/d...m.imgur.mobile
Ong88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2018, 11:29 AM   #8
globalcookie
Dragon
 
globalcookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,446
Default

This doesn't surprise me one bit. All these while, they ONLY HEAR what they want to hear, which are hypocrisy.

Take grassroots for example, these members are those who gather ground feedback but you have MP or candidates who doesn't listen to what they don't want to hear. You will be disliked by them, eventually, good chance, sacked!

However arrogant they are, doesn't matter, majority will still love them.

Is people's tsunami possible???????? Get rid of this gov, they overstayed their time!
globalcookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2018, 07:20 PM   #9
laodie
Senior Dragon
 
laodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,766
Default

i read about this article few days back. it really reminds me of one of the GRC that I used to work in. They only want you to listen and follow.

when you have opinions, you be banished into the cold storage, in which I chose to leave.
laodie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-06-2018, 12:15 PM   #10
satan_gal
Dragon
 
satan_gal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by globalcookie View Post
Take grassroots for example, these members are those who gather ground feedback but you have MP or candidates who doesn't listen to what they don't want to hear. You will be disliked by them, eventually, good chance, sacked!
Wun la...
You can't sack the grassroot member coz they are volunteers

But they will be more careful in wad they say/do when the said person is ard la.
satan_gal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +9. The time now is 01:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2000-2008 Arofanatics.com (Since 30th August 2000)