|
20-08-2008, 09:07 PM | #11 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,140
|
Quote:
|
|
20-08-2008, 11:29 PM | #12 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,140
|
Back to serious business...
F to 20+ (fm my usual 9 to 11) sharpness still Ok but gravel over exposed and subject not fully / evenly exposed. any other comment ? |
20-08-2008, 11:32 PM | #13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Seen some of the shots you took, they are excellent!
|
21-08-2008, 02:17 AM | #14 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
if your photo appears sharp then f/20+ then it is good if your fish is not moving much, it is possible to take two photos? one under exposed? then edit the sand with the under exposed photo? or shoot in raw and burn the sand... raw allows a little more space for editing too right? (read somemore too... not really good with editing either) how many flash you using again? all place directly on top? in anycase, your photo is excellent as always |
|
21-08-2008, 11:52 AM | #15 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
The best way is to shoot and use the raw picture. No editing or minimal cropping. Otherwise, you spend more time in photoshop than shooting. Cheers, p.s. I like this fish. From where? I want! |
|
21-08-2008, 12:02 PM | #16 |
Senior Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,712
|
Ben
Try shooting with bracketing option with exposure set at +- 0.3 to 0.5 Then compare the 3 pics for better exposure. |
21-08-2008, 10:55 PM | #17 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,140
|
OK, I will try all the methods next time.
btw, Benny, you can get that fish fm your neighbourhood store.. but I think they are selling very fast |
21-08-2008, 11:05 PM | #18 |
Dragon
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 836
|
photoshop is good to touch up pictures
|
15-10-2008, 04:39 AM | #19 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think your photos are the nicest around arofanatics, still need improvement?
|
17-10-2008, 09:43 PM | #20 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,140
|
Quote:
ben |
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|