|
31-08-2015, 05:01 PM | #41 |
Dragon
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,451
|
|
31-08-2015, 09:51 PM | #42 | |
Arofanatic
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 447
|
Quote:
|
|
31-08-2015, 11:03 PM | #43 |
Dragon
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,294
|
|
31-08-2015, 11:11 PM | #44 | |
Moderator
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,906
|
Quote:
I was quoting nutx. I said yours are the product of hybridization.
__________________
Life is full of empty promises and broken dreams |
|
31-08-2015, 11:21 PM | #45 |
Senior Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,832
|
|
31-08-2015, 11:38 PM | #46 |
Arofanatic
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 447
|
|
01-09-2015, 09:59 AM | #47 |
Senior Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,832
|
Ooo someone remove the link to his juv picture hmmmm
|
01-09-2015, 10:25 AM | #48 | |
Senior Dragon
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,042
|
Quote:
but sometimes, can the source be trusted? or even can the source's supplier be trusted? for all you know, your source may not have a true WC breeding colony? your female seems to show spottings. no doubt it has certain characteristics that matches, but it also has some that does not match. if it bred true and has offsprings that show it is a 173, then the female might be a one off case, but even the offsprings shows that it is not a true 173, thus it only confirms one fact. some might turn out to be looking alot like 173 because indeed 173 genes are in this gene pool. but fact it, it is contaminated. |
|
01-09-2015, 02:09 PM | #49 |
Dragon
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,215
|
Bro tustar, whats the photo u posted?
Bro flash, since u already catch out the female, u can catch out the male also to clear everyone's doubt.. if there is too much slate and dw its alright.. |
01-09-2015, 07:27 PM | #50 | |
Dragon
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,361
|
Quote:
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|