|
29-09-2010, 12:12 AM | #41 |
Endangered Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,821
|
looks more like a pale P. endlicheri endilcheri.
a clearer shot will b gd. the shots r tinted green. not easy to ID. |
29-09-2010, 12:14 AM | #42 |
Dragon
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 924
|
Wow bro, you are right. I compared the photos and its the same. Thanks alot. You guys are solid. But I still don't know what is the different. *LoL*
|
29-09-2010, 12:25 AM | #43 |
Dragon
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 984
|
I'm no expert...still learning juz like u bro.
Maybe a clearer pic will enable all the experienced bros here to be able to give u a more accurate answer. |
29-09-2010, 12:28 AM | #44 |
Endangered Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,821
|
the bars looks too thick to b P. endlicheri congicus to me.
the best way out is price. if its $~20+/- (based on my estimation of it being ~4-5") its definitely a P. endlicheri endlicheri. |
29-09-2010, 12:46 AM | #45 | ||
Dragon
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 924
|
Quote:
Quote:
Thanks bro. Will see if I can improve on my photo shot. Its 9-10inches. |
||
29-09-2010, 12:48 AM | #46 |
Endangered Dragon
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,821
|
seems like i under estimated a lot. also forgot that the external gills r gone.
|
29-09-2010, 12:58 AM | #47 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
29-09-2010, 01:07 AM | #48 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yeah it's a pale endlicheri
|
29-09-2010, 03:46 PM | #49 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Schmike is right. Firstly, take a look at their skull structure and patterns. Such thick patterns rarely occur in congicus, and it's skull structure support my statement as well. BTW Schmike, he got scammed, purchasing it at a staggering $130.
Last edited by Ornate Bichir; 29-09-2010 at 03:49 PM. |
29-09-2010, 04:10 PM | #50 |
Dragon
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,813
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|